Download e-book The Talmud: What It Is and What It Says

Free download. Book file PDF easily for everyone and every device. You can download and read online The Talmud: What It Is and What It Says file PDF Book only if you are registered here. And also you can download or read online all Book PDF file that related with The Talmud: What It Is and What It Says book. Happy reading The Talmud: What It Is and What It Says Bookeveryone. Download file Free Book PDF The Talmud: What It Is and What It Says at Complete PDF Library. This Book have some digital formats such us :paperbook, ebook, kindle, epub, fb2 and another formats. Here is The CompletePDF Book Library. It's free to register here to get Book file PDF The Talmud: What It Is and What It Says Pocket Guide.
The Love App

  1. Insights from the “Dream Book” of the Babylonian Talmud [200–500 ce]
  2. Jesus in the Talmud - Wikipedia
  3. Ideal Occupations: The Talmudic Perspective
  4. ADL Attacks Talmud Exposé

Insights from the “Dream Book” of the Babylonian Talmud [200–500 ce]

The rabbinic commentary in Sanhedrin 43a states that out of deference to the Romans' concern for Jesus' welfare, a pretense of an argument on Christ's behalf had to be mounted by the Sanhedrin because Jesus had "close connections with the non-Jewish authorities who were interested in his acquittal. The ADL must have a very low opinion of the intelligence of the average American. The ADL uses the unique and intimidating position it occupies as America's national thought cop and adjunct of the corporate media, to lie about what the Talmud actually says about Jesus.

What does the Talmud Say About Jesus? Rabbi Tovia Singer Responds

The quotes I present are taken directly from the writings about Jesus in the Talmud. I freely quote these passages because I have nothing to hide or fear from them, since they offer documentary evidence which upholds my contention concerning the bigoted, anti-Christ contents of the Talmud. The ADL knows that if their staff "experts" publicly quoted the actual Talmudic statements about Christ, they would instantly reveal the institutionalized hatred and blasphemy of Jesus Christ that is formally enshrined within the religion of Judaism.

Instead, the ADL merely talks about what it claims is and is not in the Talmud. Because they cannot. If they should do so, their staple fictions would fall by the wayside. Failing to quote directly from what the Talmud says about Jesus Christ is a glaring omission which eloquently testifies to the bankruptcy of the ADL's Talmudic whitewash, and the shoddiness of their pseudo-scholarly "refutation" of Judaism's Strange Gods.

Jesus in the Talmud - Wikipedia

The ADL is just too cowardly and intellectually dishonest to quote the Talmud passages about Jesus which it seeks to deny or falsify. I have quoted from Talmud Tractate Sanhedrin b, which declares that Jesus bowed down to a brick and worshipped it and that he practiced magic, and from Sanhedrin 43a, which says that it was right to kill Jesus and that he got what he deserved. According to the ADL these consummate examples of rabbinic hatred and contempt for Christ, are "not particularly inflammatory.

I should like to add that nowhere in the religion of Islam is Christ defamed. To highlight the absurdity of the ADL's response, let us consider the horrible malice found in the anti-Christ Talmud Tractate Gittin 57a. In some censored versions of Gittin 57a, the name of Jesus is rendered as "sinner or 'sinners' of Israel. As is its custom, the ADL shies away from actually quoting Gittin 57a. It falls to us to reveal the contents of this ugly and psychotic Talmud section:. He asked them What is your punishment? They replied: With boiling in hot excrement. The Talmud decrees that Jesus is in hell, being boiled in feces, because he opposed the rabbis.

That's what this sick, pornographic, "holy book" of Judaism says about the Christian Savior in Tractate Gittin 57a. Without daring to cite or refer to Gittin 57a directly, the ADL's convoluted defense of this passage is as follows: " Rabbinic tradition They blustered about "Balaam" at length but forgot to offer any similar exegesis of "sinners of Israel.

Gittin 57a in the Soncino edition, with its reference to "sinners of Israel" being "boiled in hot excrement," contains a footnote for the passage, labeled footnote 4. Located at the bottom of the page of Gittin 57a, footnote 4 makes reference to the fact that "sinners of Israel" is indeed a coded reference to Jesus!

Contrary to the ADL line, it is not an act of prejudice to tell the truth about the contents of the Talmud. Such truth-telling in Judaism's Strange Gods is a legitimate and salutary function of historical and exegetical inquiry and is equally liberating to "frum Yiddin" Judaics who are enslaved by rigorous observance of rabbinic dictates and traditions , as well as to goyim who are held in thrall to the rabbis by Zionist politicians, media moguls and the hirelings of Judeo-Churchianity.

Caveat: There is the possibility that the ADL may modify or otherwise alter its thoroughly bogus pamphlet as a covert response to the demolition of it herein.

Therefore, it should be noted that the preceding part one rejoinder is to the original ADL pamphlet published in February of , and not to any subsequent version they may quietly choose to alter and substitute for it, in order to attempt to salvage whatever may be left of their seriously diminished credibility. The Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith knows that the book Judaism's Strange Gods is winning converts to our Cause from around the globe, including formerly "frum" Jewish persons who find personal liberation in being set free of the evil Talmudic micro-management that oppresses every moment and detail of their lives.

I am neither Right wing nor Left wing. I am fighting the same campaign Jesus Christ undertook and with the same Enemy. All of the anti-Talmud points cited by the ADL in its press release, originate with my research, which Mr.

Jesus — A Real Person of History

Duke later "borrowed" for his own book, occasionally crediting me in a footnote, and many times omitting me as his source. Duke uses Talmud-criticism to bolster his Darwinian racial views, my educational mission vis a vis the Talmud, undermines the philosophical basis of all supremacy, whether Jewish or white.

Ideal Occupations: The Talmudic Perspective

BT Shabbat b also discusses Lilith, warning that a man should not sleep alone in a house lest Lilith fall upon him in his sleep. According to this and other texts, Lilith is a female succubus not unlike the lillu demons referenced above. The rabbis believed she was responsible for nocturnal emissions while a man was sleeping and that Lilith used the semen she collected to give birth to hundreds of demon babies. Why do not all other dreams exhaust a man, yet this [a dream of intimacy takes place] does exhaust a man.

Because from the very beginning of her creation she was but in a dream.

  • Modern China: All That Matters.
  • Slum Life Rising: How to Enflesh Hope within a New Urban World?
  • You might also like?

Share Flipboard Email. Updated February 22, Baskin, Judith. If [the convert] is a woman, women support her in water up to her neck, and two learned men stand outside, reminding her of some of the easy mitzvot and some of the hard ones.

ADL Attacks Talmud Exposé

A teacher said: If someone presents himself nowadays for conversion we say to him: Why do you wish to convert? We instruct him in some of the easy mitzvot and some of the hard ones. What is the reason for this? Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said in the name of Rabbi Yochanan, Because Noahides are executed for the theft of even less than a peruta , and cannot [avoid punishment by] restoring [the stolen property]. Rabbi Eleazar said, Where do we find this in Scripture? If strips [of foreskin] are left that invalidate the circumcision, this is corrected. When he has recovered, but not before he has recovered.

Why is this? Because water irritates the wound. Two learned men stand nearby As soon as he emerges and dries himself he is an Israelite in all respects. How does this affect the law? If he reverts, and then marries an Israelite woman, he has the status of an apostate Israelite and any marriage he contracts is valid. The same procedure applies to a proselyte as to a slave who is being freed. As against that [assumption, a baraita states]: To whom does this apply?